HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Octavia 4 vs Audi A7 C8 vs Audi A5 Sportback B9 facelift

Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
40 TDI
40 TDI quattro
45 TDI quattro
45 TFSI
45 TFSI quattro
45 TFSI ultra
45 TFSI ultra quattro
50 TDI quattro
50 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI quattro
35 TDI
35 TFSI
35 TFSI MT
40 g-tron
40 TDI
40 TDI quattro
40 TDI quattro
40 TFSI
40 TFSI
40 TFSI quattro
45 TDI quattro
45 TFSI Euro6d quattro
45 TFSI quattro
50 TDI quattro

Capacity

Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
13.1 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
12.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
381.0 V

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1386 mm / 54.6 in
Size | Length
4757 mm / 187.3 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1908 mm / 75.1 in | 2118 mm / 83.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2029 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1651.0 mm / 65.0 in
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1637.0 mm / 64.4 in
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Wheelbase
2926 mm / 115.2 in
2824 mm / 111.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.26

Production

Debut
2018 North American Autho Show / 2019 Frankfurt Motor Show
Made In
Germany

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
67%
68%
Pros
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • Small turning circle
  • Some towing capacity
  • Good performance
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good performance
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uglier than the A6
  • Impractical
  • Sold with small engines
  • Too many electronic gizmos
  • Rather complex
  • Too many electronics

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.