Compare Lexus GS 4 facelift vs Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) vs Alfa Romeo 166

Variants
GS 200t
GS 300
GS 300h
GS 350
GS 350 AWD
GS 450h
GS F
2.0T 200 AT
2.0T 200 Euro6d AT
2.0T 280 AT
2.0T 280 AWD AT
2.2 JTDm 136
2.2 JTDm 150
2.2 JTDm 150 AT
2.2 JTDm 180
2.2 JTDm 180 AT
2.2 JTDm 136 Euro6d
2.2 JTDm 136 Euro6d AT
2.2 JTDm 160 Euro6d AT
2.2 JTDm 190 Euro6d AT
2.2 JTDm 190 Euro6d AWD AT
2.2 JTDm 210 Euro6d AWD AT
Quadrifoglio
Quadrifoglio AT
Quadrifoglio Euro6d AT
Veloce 2.0T 280 AWD AT
Veloce 2.2 JTDm 210 AWD AT
2.0 TS 150PS
2.0 TS 155PS
2.0 V6 205PS
2.4 JTD 136PS
2.4 JTD 140PS
2.4 JTD 150PS
2.5 V6 188PS
2.5 V6 190PS
2.5 V6 190PS AT
3.0 V6 220PS
3.0 V6 220PS AT
3.0 V6 226PS
3.0 V6 226PS AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
396 L / 14.0 cu-ft
480 L / 17.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
510 kg / 1124 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Length
4720 mm / 185.8 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
Track Width | Front
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1532.0 mm / 60.3 in
Wheelbase
2820 mm / 111.0 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
745 kg / 1642 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm

Reviews

Neofiliac score
88%
77%
28%
Pros
  • Exceptionally styling
  • Down to 4.6s 0-100kph time
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Great V8 in the GS F
  • Exceptionally reliable
  • Gorgeous styling
  • Good power delivery in the Quadrifoglio
  • Manual transmission
  • Great suspension setup
  • Double-wishbone suspensions all-around
  • Rather good-looking (though worse than 156)
Cons
  • Uninspiring I4 engine found its way to the mix
  • Too many hybrids sold
  • Reliability concerns
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.