Compare Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP) vs Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN) vs Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH1)

Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)

Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)

Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH1)

Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH1)
Variants
1.5 118 AT
1.8D 116
1.8D 116 AT
2.0 122
2.0 122 AT
2.0 162 AT
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181 AT
2.5 186 AT
2.5 186 AWD AT
1.5 SkyActiv-D
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.5 SkyActiv-G
2.5 SkyActiv-G AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D
2.2D 163hp
2.2D 185hp
2.5
3.7 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score48%35%34%
Pros
  • Interesting Skyactiv-X engine
  • Improved styling
  • Good engine reliability
  • Good exterior and interior design
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Elegant exterior design
Cons
  • No independent rear suspension
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine option
  • Old transmission options
  • Sterile interior

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.