Compare Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2 vs Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN) vs Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2

Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)

Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)
Variants
2.0 145
2.0 165
2.0 165 AT
2.2D 150
2.2D 150 AT
2.2D 184
2.2D 184 AT
2.5 187
2.5 187 AT
2.5 194 AT
2.5 227 AT
2.5 250 AT
1.5 SkyActiv-D
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.5 SkyActiv-G
2.5 SkyActiv-G AT
1.5 118 AT
1.8D 116
1.8D 116 AT
2.0 122
2.0 122 AT
2.0 162 AT
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181 AT
2.5 186 AT
2.5 186 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score53%35%48%
Pros
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good engine reliability
  • Good exterior and interior design
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Interesting Skyactiv-X engine
  • Improved styling
  • Good engine reliability
Cons
  • Bland styling
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.