Compare Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2 vs Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN) vs Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1) facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2

Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)

Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1) facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1) facelift
Variants
2.0 145
2.0 165
2.0 165 AT
2.2D 150
2.2D 150 AT
2.2D 184
2.2D 184 AT
2.5 187
2.5 187 AT
2.5 194 AT
2.5 227 AT
2.5 250 AT
1.5 SkyActiv-D
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.5 SkyActiv-G
2.5 SkyActiv-G AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 121hp
2.0D 143hp
2.3
2.3 AT
Mazdaspeed6 (MPS)

Reviews

Neofiliac score53%35%38%
Pros
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good engine reliability
  • Good exterior and interior design
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Interesting Mazdaspeed6 option
Cons
  • Bland styling
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Somewhat sterile inside
  • Base engines are lethargic

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.