Compare Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2 vs Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift vs Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) faceliftMazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift
Variants
2.0 145
2.0 165
2.0 165 AT
2.2D 150
2.2D 150 AT
2.2D 184
2.2D 184 AT
2.5 187
2.5 187 AT
2.5 194 AT
2.5 227 AT
2.5 250 AT
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score53%42%27%
Pros
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good engine reliability
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Bland styling
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Hatchback version fits the car better
  • No powerful engine options
  • GPF ruins many good petrol engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson strut

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.