Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Jaguar XE X760 vs Infiniti Q50 facelift

Volvo S90 facelift

Jaguar XE X760

Infiniti Q50 facelift

Volvo S90 faceliftJaguar XE X760Infiniti Q50 facelift
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
20d
20d AWD
20d MT
20t
25d AWD
25t
25t 2017
25t AWD
30t
30t AWD
35t
D180
D180 AWD
D200
D200 AWD
E-Performance
E-Performance MT
P250
P250 AWD
P250 Euro6d
P250 Euro6d AWD
P300
P300 AWD
P300 Euro6d AWD
SV Project 8
XE S
2.0t AT
2.2d
2.2d AT
3.0t 300 AWD AT
3.0t 400 AWD AT
3.5 Hybrid AT
3.5 Hybrid AWD AT
S 3.0t AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score64%60%79%
Pros
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent interior
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Great suspension setup
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • Above average styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Cons
  • Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable
  • Bland styling
  • Reliability concerns
  • Little improvement over pre-facelift
  • Hybrid nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.