Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Kia Optima 2 vs Kia Optima 3 facelift
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
2.0
2.0 CRDi
2.7 AT
1.7 CRDi
1.7 CRDi AT
2.0 CVVT
2.0 CVVT AT
2.0 CVVT EcoDynamics
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 T-GDI AT
2.4 GDI AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
496 L / 17.5 cu-ft ~ 816 L / 28.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/60 R16
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1455 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
4735 mm / 186.4 in
4845 mm / 190.7 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1805 mm / 71.1 in
1830 mm / 72.0 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2795 mm / 110.0 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26 ~ 0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Towing Capacity
650 kg / 1433 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Engine
D4EA
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2020
2005 ~ 2008
2010 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
64%
37%
44%
Pros
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good towing capacity
- More modern design
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Reasonable exterior styling
Cons
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.