Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Volvo S60 II facelift vs Volvo S60 Cross Country

Volvo S90 facelift

Volvo S60 II facelift

Volvo S60 Cross Country

Volvo S90 faceliftVolvo S60 II faceliftVolvo S60 Cross Country
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
D2 115PS
D2 115PS AT
D2 120PS
D2 120PS AT
D3 136PS
D3 136PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
D4 190PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 225PS AT
Polestar 350PS
Polestar 367PS
T2 AT
T3
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T3 AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4 190PS
T4 190PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 304PS AWD AT
T6 306PS AT
T6 306PS AWD AT
D3
D3 AT
D4
D4 AT
D4 AWD AT
T5 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score64%61%40%
Pros
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Interesting range of I5 and I6 engines
  • Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Rather questionable exterior design
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.