Compare Volvo S60 III vs Volvo S90 facelift vs Volvo S60 Cross Country

Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
D3
D3 AT
D4
D4 AT
D4 AWD AT
T5 AWD AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
67.5 L / 17.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
554 kg / 1221 lbs
474 kg / 1045 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
156 mm / 6.1 in
201 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1431 mm / 56.3 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1539 mm / 60.6 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4969 mm / 195.6 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1619.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Weight
1656.0 kg / 3650.9 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2774 mm / 109.2 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.26 ~ 0.29
0.28
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Redline
5000 rpm
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020
2015 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
61%
64%
40%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good interior quality
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Lack smoothness
  • Unreliable engines
  • Too many electronic gimmicks
  • Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable
  • Rather questionable exterior design
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.