Compare Volvo S60 III vs Volvo S40 II facelift vs Renault Talisman facelift

Volvo S60 III

Volvo S40 II facelift

Renault Talisman facelift

Volvo S60 IIIVolvo S40 II faceliftRenault Talisman facelift
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
1.3 TCe 4CONTROL EDC
1.3 TCe EDC
1.7 Blue dCi
1.7 Blue dCi 4CONTROL
2.0 Blue dCi 160 4CONTROL EDC
2.0 Blue dCi 160 EDC
2.0 Blue dCi 200 4CONTROL EDC
2.0 Blue dCi 200 EDC

Reviews

Neofiliac score61%36%6%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good interior quality
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Quite reliable
  • Available with the famous Volvo T5
  • Fuel efficient
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Lack smoothness
  • Unreliable engines
  • Too many electronic gimmicks
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor performance
  • Poor build quality
  • Bland styling
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Only available with small engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.