Compare Volvo S60 III vs Volvo S40 II facelift vs Volvo S80 II

Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
2.4D
2.4D AT
D5
D5 AT
2.5FT
2.5FT AT
2.5T
2.5T AT
3.2 AT
4.4 AT
4.4 AWD AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
480 L / 17.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
554 kg / 1221 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Independent, spring multi-link with stabilizer
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
148 mm / 5.8 in
Size | Height
1431 mm / 56.3 in
1490 mm / 58.7 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4851 mm / 191.0 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1770 mm / 69.7 in
1860 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2835 mm / 111.6 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
38.0 m / 124.6 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.29

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
61%
36%
55%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good interior quality
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Quite reliable
  • Available with the famous Volvo T5
  • Sweet NA 4.4L V8
  • Turbo I6
  • Classy design
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Lack smoothness
  • Unreliable engines
  • Too many electronic gimmicks
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.