Compare Jaguar XF X260 vs Volvo S60 III vs Skoda Octavia 4
Variants
20d
20d AWD
20d Euro6d
20d Euro6d AWD
20d Euro6d MT
20d MHEV
20d MHEV AWD
20d MT
20t
25d
25d AWD
25d Euro6d AWD
25t
25t AWD
25t Euro6d
25t Euro6d AWD
25t Euro6d TEMP
30d
30d AWD
30t AWD
30t AWD
30t Euro6d AWD
35t
35t AWD
E-Performance
E-Performance Euro6d
E-Performance Euro6d MT
E-Performance MT
XF S
XF S AWD
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
554 kg / 1221 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
116 mm / 4.6 in
142 mm / 5.6 in
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1431 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2960 mm / 116.5 in
2872 mm / 113.1 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
71%
61%
37%
Pros
- Good supercharged V6
- Good 0.25 drag coefficient
- Good interior quality
- Decent styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Good interior quality
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
- Small turning circle
- Some towing capacity
Cons
- Poor reliability
- Bland styling
- Only available with small engines
- Lack smoothness
- Unreliable engines
- Too many electronic gimmicks
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.