Compare Jaguar XF X260 vs Audi A4 B6 vs Jaguar X-Type

Variants
20d
20d AWD
20d Euro6d
20d Euro6d AWD
20d Euro6d MT
20d MHEV
20d MHEV AWD
20d MT
20t
25d
25d AWD
25d Euro6d AWD
25t
25t AWD
25t Euro6d
25t Euro6d AWD
25t Euro6d TEMP
30d
30d AWD
30t AWD
30t AWD
30t Euro6d AWD
35t
35t AWD
E-Performance
E-Performance Euro6d
E-Performance Euro6d MT
E-Performance MT
XF S
XF S AWD
1.6
1.8T 150hp
1.8T 150hp CVT
1.8T 150hp quattro
1.8T 163hp
1.8T 163hp CVT
1.8T 163hp quattro
1.8T 170hp
1.8T 170hp CVT
1.8T 170hp quattro
1.8T 170hp quattro AT
1.8T 190hp
1.8T 190hp quattro
1.9 TDI 101hp
1.9 TDI 115hp
1.9 TDI 130hp
1.9 TDI 130hp CVT
1.9 TDI 130hp quattro
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0 FSI 150hp
2.4
2.4 CVT
2.5 TDI 155hp
2.5 TDI 155hp CVT
2.5 TDI 163hp
2.5 TDI 163hp CVT
2.5 TDI 180hp quattro
2.5 TDI 180hp quattro AT
3.0
3.0 CVT
3.0 quattro
3.0 quattro AT
2.0D
2.1
2.1 AT
2.2D
2.5
2.5 AT
3.0
3.0 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft ~ 720 L / 25.4 cu-ft
452 L / 16.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
550 kg / 1213 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Ford CD132

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
116 mm / 4.6 in
Size | Height
1428 mm / 56.2 in
1430 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4548 mm / 179.1 in
4672 mm / 183.9 in
Size | Width
1772 mm / 69.8 in
1789 mm / 70.4 in
Track Width | Front
1528.0 mm / 60.2 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
Wheelbase
2960 mm / 116.5 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2710 mm / 106.7 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 3

Reviews

Neofiliac score
71%
47%
38%
Pros
  • Good supercharged V6
  • Good 0.25 drag coefficient
  • Good interior quality
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Beautiful front-end
  • Well-appointed interiors
Cons
  • Poor reliability
  • Bland styling
  • CVT for FWD
  • Unreliable automatic transmissions
  • Still very front-heavy
  • Some oil consumption issues
  • Limited by MacPherson strut front suspension
  • No powerful engine options
  • FWD on a Jag

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.