Compare Maserati Quattroporte 6 vs Tesla Model 3 facelift vs Tesla Model S facelift

Variants
Quattroporte
Quattroporte 2016
Quattroporte Diesel
Quattroporte GTS
Quattroporte S
Quattroporte S 2017
Quattroporte S Q4
Quattroporte S Q4 2017
Quattroporte Trofeo
60 kWh
Long Range 82 kWh AWD
Performance 82 kWh AWD
Standard Plus 54 kWh
100D
60
60D
70
70D
75
75D
90D
Long Range
P100D
P90D
P90D AWD
Performance

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
649 L / 22.9 cu-ft
745 L / 26.3 cu-ft ~ 1645 L / 58.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
14.2 L / 15.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.3 L / 8.8 qt
Passengers
5
5
Payload
426 kg / 939 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 335x20 mm
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double wishb
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
100 kWh
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door battery-electric Sedan
5-door battery-electric Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1481 mm / 58.3 in
1443 mm / 56.8 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
5262 mm / 207.2 in
4694 mm / 184.8 in
4980 mm
Size | Width
1849 mm / 72.8 in | 2088 mm / 82.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1933 mm / 76.1 in (mirror folded)
1964 mm
Track Width | Front
1634.0 mm / 64.3 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1647.0 mm / 64.8 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Weight
1961 - 2250 kg
Wheel Size
19"; 21" (optional)
Wheelbase
3171 mm / 124.8 in
2875 mm / 113.2 in
2960 mm

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.24

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Dual motor AWD
Engine
F154 AM
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
1-speed
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Debut
2012-06-22
Made In
US: California; EU: Netherlands

Reviews

Neofiliac score
82%
73%
74%
Pros
  • Good handling
  • Improved performance
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Improved interior quality
  • Great performance
  • Up to extraordinary 614km electric range
  • Down to exceptional 2.5s 0-100kph time
  • Up to 598hp of power
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
Cons
  • Uglier than before
  • No more NA engine
  • Too many gimmicks
  • Somewhat ugly
  • Lots of reliability issues

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.