Compare Infiniti Q50 facelift vs Infiniti Q70 / M-Series IV / Nissan Cima / Fuga (Y51) vs Alfa Romeo 166 (936)

Infiniti Q50 facelift

Infiniti Q70 / M-Series IV / Nissan Cima / Fuga (Y51)

Alfa Romeo 166 (936)

Infiniti Q50 faceliftInfiniti Q70 / M-Series IV / Nissan Cima / Fuga (Y51)Alfa Romeo 166 (936)
Variants
2.0t AT
2.2d
2.2d AT
3.0t 300 AWD AT
3.0t 400 AWD AT
3.5 Hybrid AT
3.5 Hybrid AWD AT
S 3.0t AT
M30d
M35h
M37
M37x
M56
M56x
2.0 TS 150PS
2.0 TS 155PS
2.0 V6 205PS
2.4 JTD 136PS
2.4 JTD 140PS
2.4 JTD 150PS
2.5 V6 188PS
2.5 V6 190PS
2.5 V6 190PS AT
3.0 V6 220PS
3.0 V6 220PS AT
3.0 V6 226PS
3.0 V6 226PS AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score79%87%28%
Pros
  • Great suspension setup
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • Above average styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Powerful and reliable NA V6 and V8 engines
  • Fantastic styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • RWD as standard (though lots of AWD nonsense was sold)
  • Double-wishbone suspensions all-around
  • Rather good-looking (though worse than 156)
Cons
  • Little improvement over pre-facelift
  • Hybrid nonsense
  • Getting dirty with diesel and hybrid
  • Series discontinued
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.