HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi R8 (42) Spyder vs Chevrolet Camaro 4 Convertible vs Chevrolet Camaro 5 Convertible

Variants
4.2 FSI 6DCT
4.2 FSI 7DCT
4.2 FSI MT
5.2 FSI 2012+ MT
5.2 FSI 6DCT
5.2 FSI 7DCT
5.2 FSI MT
GT
3.4
3.4 AT
3.8 193
3.8 203
3.8 203 AT
5.7 279
5.7 279 AT
5.7 344 AT
Z28
Z28 AT
L99 AT
LS3

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
100 L / 3.5 cu-ft
215 L / 7.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
25.0 L / 26.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
300 kg / 661 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Solid axle
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
110 mm / 4.3 in
Size | Height
1244 mm / 49.0 in
1378 mm / 54.3 in
Size | Length
4837 mm / 190.4 in
Size | Width
1917 mm / 75.5 in
Track Width | Front
1638.0 mm / 64.5 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2852 mm / 112.3 in

Performance

Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
87%
72%
76%
Pros
  • Characterful V10 engine
  • Glorious 8700rpm redline
  • Great handling characteristics
  • Manual transmission
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Gorgeous with top down
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent build quality
  • Easy to work on
  • Athletic design
  • Wide range of powerful yet efficient engine choices
  • Improved drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Dated styling
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Low side and rear visibility

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.