Compare Audi TTS 8J Roadster vs Mazda MX-5 ND vs Mazda MX-5 NC1
Variants
MT
DCT
1.5 SkyActiv-G
1.5 SkyActiv-G 2018
2.0 SkyActiv-G 160
RF 2.0 SkyActiv-G 160
2.0 SkyActiv-G 160 AT
2.0 SkyActiv-G 181
RF 2.0 SkyActiv-G 181
2.0 SkyActiv-G 181 AT
RF 2.0 SkyActiv-G 181 AT
1.8
2.0 AT
2.0 6MT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft
150 L / 5.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.0 L / 9.5 qt
6.0 L / 6.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
2
2
2
Payload
320 kg / 705 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
245/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1350 mm / 53.1 in
1245 mm / 49.0 in
Size | Length
4198 mm / 165.3 in
3995 mm / 157.3 in
Size | Width
1842 mm / 72.5 in | 1952 mm / 76.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Wheel Size
9J x 18
Wheelbase
2468 mm / 97.2 in
2330 mm / 91.7 in
Performance
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
CDLB
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
13.0:1
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.1 cu-in / 1984.0 cc
Engine | Power
272.0 hp / 202.8 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Redline
7500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
137.1 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
350 Nm / 258.1 lb-ft @ 2500-5000 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2008 ~ 2010
2005 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
58%
86%
86%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Decent performance
- Rigid chassis
- Slightly better built
- Reliable drivetrain
- Enjoyable 7500rpm redline
- Small turning circle
- Superb handling characteristics
- High reliability
- New hard top
- Sweet manual transmissions
- Improved performance
Cons
- Engine not special
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Only AWD
- Only available with small engines
- Very little cargo space
- Only available with small engines
- Very little cargo space
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.