HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare BMW Z4 E85 LCI vs Audi TT (8J) Roadster vs Audi A3 (8V) Cabriolet

Variants
2.0i
2.5si
2.5si AT
2.5i
2.5i AT
3.0si
3.0si AT
1.8 TFSI
1.8 TFSI Euro5
1.8 TFSI DCT
2.0 TDI quattro
2.0 TDI quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 200
2.0 TFSI 200 Euro5 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 200 DCT
2.0 TFSI 211
2.0 TFSI 211 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 211 DCT
3.2 quattro
3.2 quattro DCT
1.4 TFSI 125
1.4 TFSI 125 DCT
1.4 TFSI 140
1.4 TFSI 140 DCT
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
1.4 TFSI COD ultra DCT
1.6 TDI
1.8 TFSI
1.8 TFSI 172
1.8 TFSI DCT
1.8 TFSI quattro DCT
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DCT
2.0 TDI 150 quattro
2.0 TDI 184
2.0 TDI 184 quattro DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
320 L / 11.3 cu-ft ~ 678 L / 23.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Payload
320 kg / 705 lbs
500 kg / 1102 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1358 mm / 53.5 in
1409 mm / 55.5 in
Size | Length
4421 mm / 174.1 in
Size | Width
1781 mm / 70.1 in
1793 mm / 70.6 in | 1960 mm / 77.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
Wheelbase
2468 mm / 97.2 in
2595 mm / 102.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.36

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2008

Reviews

Neofiliac score
83%
71%
49%
Pros
  • Good N52 engine
  • New ZF 6HP autoamtic transmission
  • Electric power steering problem fixed
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Manual widely available
  • Interesting VR6 engine
  • Decent handling
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Improved (though still not great) styling
Cons
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Average looks with the top up
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.