Compare Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift vs Mercedes-AMG SL-Class R232 vs Cadillac XLR

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift

Mercedes-AMG SL-Class R232

Cadillac XLR

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 faceliftMercedes-AMG SL-Class R232Cadillac XLR
Variants
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 MT
CLK 280 MT
CLK 320 CDI MT
CLK 350
CLK 500 M113
CLK 500 M273
SL 55 4MATIC+
SL 63 4MATIC+
XLR
XLR-V

Reviews

Neofiliac score71%88%89%
Pros
  • More powerful drivetrain
  • Improvement in build quality
  • Rather good performance
  • Decent styling
  • Good handling
  • Good build quality
  • Wonderful styling
  • Hardtop convertible
  • As well built as any modern Cadillac
  • Rear-mounted transmission
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Some engine reliability concerns
  • Obsession with AWD
  • I4 engine in an SL
  • Larger than before
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.