Compare Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz SL R230 vs Cadillac XLR

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift

Mercedes-Benz SL R230

Cadillac XLR

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 faceliftMercedes-Benz SL R230Cadillac XLR
Variants
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 MT
CLK 280 MT
CLK 320 CDI MT
CLK 350
CLK 500 M113
CLK 500 M273
SL 55 AMG
SL 65 AMG
SL 350 MT
SL 350
SL 500
SL 600
XLR
XLR-V

Reviews

Neofiliac score71%96%89%
Pros
  • More powerful drivetrain
  • Improvement in build quality
  • Superb V8 and V12 engine lineup
  • Elegant yet athletic styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Wonderful styling
  • Hardtop convertible
  • As well built as any modern Cadillac
  • Rear-mounted transmission
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Some engine reliability concerns
  • Bad electronics inside
  • ABC suspension problems
  • Unbefitting V6 offered
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.