Compare Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz E-Class Cabriolet A238 vs Mercedes-Benz SLC R172 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift

Mercedes-Benz E-Class Cabriolet A238

Mercedes-Benz SLC R172 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 faceliftMercedes-Benz E-Class Cabriolet A238Mercedes-Benz SLC R172 facelift
Variants
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 MT
CLK 280 MT
CLK 320 CDI MT
CLK 350
CLK 500 M113
CLK 500 M273
AMG E 53 4MATIC+
E 200 M274 4MATIC
E 200 M274
E 200 M264 4MATIC
E 200 M264
E 220d 4MATIC
E 220d
E 300 M274
E 300 M264
E 300d
E 350
E 350d 4MATIC
E 350d
E 400 4MATIC
E 400d 4MATIC
E 450 Euro6d 4MATIC
E 450 4MATIC
AMG SLC 43 367
AMG SLC 43 390
SLC 180 MT
SLC 180
SLC 200 MT
SLC 200
SLC 250d
SLC 300

Reviews

Neofiliac score71%77%73%
Pros
  • More powerful drivetrain
  • Improvement in build quality
  • Much improved, almost luxurious styling
  • Improved build quality
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good suspension setup
  • Multi-link suspensions all around
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Some engine reliability concerns
  • No more V8
  • Downsized engines
  • Too many electronics
  • AWD nonsense
  • Downsized engine lineup
  • Ridiculous emission requirements
  • Stuffed full of electronics

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.