Compare Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift vs Citroen C3 Pluriel vs Nissan Micra / March C+C (K12)

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift

Citroen C3 Pluriel

Nissan Micra / March C+C (K12)

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 faceliftCitroen C3 PlurielNissan Micra / March C+C (K12)
Variants
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 MT
CLK 280 MT
CLK 320 CDI MT
CLK 350
CLK 500 M113
CLK 500 M273
1.1
1.4 HDi
1.4 HDi Euro4
1.4i
1.4i Euro4
1.6i AT
1.6i Euro4 AT
1.4
1.6

Reviews

Neofiliac score71%25%10%
Pros
  • More powerful drivetrain
  • Improvement in build quality
  • Innovative top configuration
  • Easy to fix
  • Decent reliability
  • No diesel nonsense
  • Optional glass roof
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Some engine reliability concerns
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, rough-running engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly indeed
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.