Compare Mercedes CLK A209 facelift Convertible vs Saab 9-3 Convertible vs Renault Megane 2 CC
Variants
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 MT
CLK 280 MT
CLK 320 CDI MT
CLK 350
CLK 500 M113
CLK 500 M273
2.0T 185
2.0T 205
2.3i 150 AT
2.3T 230
2.3i 150
1.5 dCi 103
1.6
1.6 AT
1.9 dCi 120
1.9 dCi 130 Euro4
1.9 dCi 130 Euro4 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 Turbo
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
390 L / 13.8 cu-ft
295 L / 10.4 cu-ft ~ 378 L / 13.3 cu-ft
190 L / 6.7 cu-ft ~ 490 L / 17.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.5 L / 9.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1404 mm / 55.3 in
Size | Length
4652 mm / 183.1 in
4629 mm / 182.2 in
4355 mm / 171.5 in
Size | Width
1711 mm / 67.4 in
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2026 mm / 79.8 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1442.0 mm / 56.8 in
1514.0 mm / 59.6 in
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2605 mm / 102.6 in
2522 mm / 99.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
90.0 mm / 3.5 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
71%
53%
16%
Pros
- More powerful drivetrain
- Improvement in build quality
- Overall good styling
- Decent reliability
- Easy and cheap to fix
- Hardtop convertible
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Some engine reliability concerns
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Slow and sluggish
- No powerful engine options
- Diesel nonsense
- No independent rear suspensions
- Ugly
- Unreliable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.