Compare Porsche Boxster 987.2 vs Audi TT RS 8J Roadster vs Audi A4 B7 Cabriolet
Variants
Boxster
Boxster PDK
Boxster S
Boxster S PDK
2.5 TFSI (340 Hp)
TT RS DCT
TT RS MT
TT RS plus DCT
TT RS plus MT
1.8T
1.8T CVT
1.8T quattro
2.0
2.0 TDI
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI CVT
2.5 TDI
2.5 TDI CVT
2.7 TDI CVT
3.0 TDI quattro
3.0 TDI quattro AT
3.2 FSI
3.2 FSI quattro
3.2 FSI quattro AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
130 L / 4.6 cu-ft
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft
246 L / 8.7 cu-ft ~ 315 L / 11.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
23.0 L / 24.3 qt
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.5 L / 7.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Payload
320 kg / 705 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 318x28 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/40 R18
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1348 mm / 53.1 in
1391 mm / 54.8 in
Size | Length
4342 mm / 170.9 in
4198 mm / 165.3 in
4573 mm / 180.0 in
Size | Width
1801 mm / 70.9 in | 1978 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1842 mm / 72.5 in | 1952 mm / 76.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1777 mm / 70.0 in
Track Width | Front
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheel Size
9J x 18
7J x 16
Wheelbase
2415 mm / 95.1 in
2468 mm / 97.2 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.1 m / 111.8 ft
Braking | 200 km/h - 0
136.4 m / 447.4 ft
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.3 cu-in / 2480.0 cc
Engine | Redline
7500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
77.5 mm / 3.1 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-5 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
84%
74%
61%
Pros
- New engine lineup
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- New PDK
- Improved styling
- Decent performance
- Interesting 2.5 TFSI engine
- Decent reliability
- Improved engine output
- Better ZF 6HP auto transmission
- Improved electronics
- Multi-link suspensions all around
Cons
- MacPherson suspensions all around
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Awkward styling
- Horrible CVT problems
- AWD nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.