Compare Chevrolet Corvette C7 Convertible vs Ford Mustang 6 Convertible vs Ford Focus CC
Variants
Grand Sport
Grand Sport AT
Stingray
Stingray AT
Z06
Z06 AT
ZR1
ZR1 AT
2.3 EcoBoost 309
2.3 EcoBoost 309 AT
2.3 EcoBoost 317
2.3 EcoBoost 317 AT
3.7 304
3.7 304 AT
GT 421
GT 421 AT
GT 426
GT 426 AT
1.6 Duratec
2.0 Duratec AT
2.0 TDCi
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
332 L / 11.7 cu-ft
238 L / 8.4 cu-ft ~ 534 L / 18.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55R16
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1394 mm / 54.9 in
1456 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4509 mm / 177.5 in
Size | Width
1834 mm / 72.2 in
Track Width | Front
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
11.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
11.3 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Fuel Economy
8.3 L/100km / 28.3 MPG (combined) | 11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (urban) | 6.3 L/100km / 37.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
198.0 km/h / 123.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
2.0 L / 122.0 cu-in / 1999.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
72.5 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
190 Nm / 140.1 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2017
2006 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
96%
78%
25%
Pros
- Superb performance
- Much improved handling
- Great chassis and suspension
- High drivetrain reliability
- Unique 7-speed manual transmission
- Improved styling
- Better build quality
- Fully independent suspensions
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Hardtop convertible
Cons
- The Targa may be more interesting
- Tiny inline-4 engine
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- Awkward styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.