Compare Chevrolet Corvette C6 Convertible vs Ford Mustang 5 Convertible vs Chevrolet Camaro 6 Convertible
Variants
Z06
Z06 AT
Mustang
Mustang GT 304
Mustang GT 324
Mustang GT 324 AT
Mustang GT 500 507
Mustang GT 500 558
Mustang GT 500 672
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
3.6
3.6 AT
6.2
6.2 AT
ZL1
ZL1 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
144 L / 5.1 cu-ft ~ 295 L / 10.4 cu-ft
275 L / 9.7 cu-ft
206 L / 7.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.9 L / 12.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Solid axle
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/40 R19
Turning Circle
11.3 m / 37.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1246 mm / 49.1 in
Size | Length
4435 mm / 174.6 in
Size | Width
1844 mm / 72.6 in
1877 mm / 73.9 in
Track Width | Front
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
Weight
1490.0 kg / 3284.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2686 mm / 105.7 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2811 mm / 110.7 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.0 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
0.37
Fuel Economy
12.4 L/100km / 19.0 MPG (urban) | 8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
290.0 km/h / 180.2 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 b
Engine
LS2
Engine | Bore
101.6 mm / 4.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.9:1
Engine | Displacement
6.0 L / 364.1 cu-in / 5967.0 cc
Engine | Power
405.0 hp / 302.0 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.9 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
543 Nm / 400.5 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2013
Reviews
Neofiliac score
87%
73%
80%
Pros
- Superb engine lineup
- Great drivetrain reliability
- Good tunability
- Solid chassis design
- Great handling
- Great V8 choices
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Improved sporty styling
- Decent performance
- Affordable way to get a big V8
- Sounds great
Cons
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Basic suspension setup
- Build quality concerns
- High 0.37 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.