HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chevrolet Camaro 5 Convertible vs Ford Mustang 6 Convertible vs Chevrolet Camaro 6 Convertible

Variants
L99 AT
LS3
2.3 EcoBoost 309
2.3 EcoBoost 309 AT
2.3 EcoBoost 317
2.3 EcoBoost 317 AT
3.7 304
3.7 304 AT
GT 421
GT 421 AT
GT 426
GT 426 AT
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
3.6
3.6 AT
6.2
6.2 AT
ZL1
ZL1 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
332 L / 11.7 cu-ft
206 L / 7.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
4
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1378 mm / 54.3 in
1394 mm / 54.9 in
Size | Length
4837 mm / 190.4 in
Size | Width
1917 mm / 75.5 in
Track Width | Front
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheelbase
2852 mm / 112.3 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2811 mm / 110.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
0.37
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6 b
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
76%
78%
80%
Pros
  • Athletic design
  • Wide range of powerful yet efficient engine choices
  • Improved drivetrain reliability
  • Improved styling
  • Better build quality
  • Fully independent suspensions
  • Decent performance
  • Affordable way to get a big V8
  • Sounds great
Cons
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Low side and rear visibility
  • Tiny inline-4 engine
  • Build quality concerns
  • High 0.37 drag coefficient
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.