Compare Chevrolet Camaro 5 Convertible vs Ford Mustang 4 Convertible vs Ford Focus CC
Variants
L99 AT
LS3
3.8 147
3.8 190
3.8 GT 152
4.6 Cobra R
4.6 Cobra
4.6 GT 215
4.6 GT 228
4.6 GT 263
5.0 GT
1.6 Duratec
2.0 Duratec AT
2.0 TDCi
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
238 L / 8.4 cu-ft ~ 534 L / 18.9 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Solid axle
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55R16
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1378 mm / 54.3 in
1456 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4837 mm / 190.4 in
4509 mm / 177.5 in
Size | Width
1917 mm / 75.5 in
1834 mm / 72.2 in
Track Width | Front
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheelbase
2852 mm / 112.3 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
11.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
11.3 sec
Fuel Economy
8.3 L/100km / 28.3 MPG (combined) | 11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (urban) | 6.3 L/100km / 37.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
198.0 km/h / 123.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
2.0 L / 122.0 cu-in / 1999.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
72.5 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
190 Nm / 140.1 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
76%
69%
25%
Pros
- Athletic design
- Wide range of powerful yet efficient engine choices
- Improved drivetrain reliability
- Good reliability record
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Hardtop convertible
Cons
- Low cargo capacity
- Low side and rear visibility
- Basic suspension setup
- Low cargo capacity
- Down on power
- Inefficient
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- Awkward styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.