Compare Chevrolet Camaro 5 Convertible vs Opel Astra H TwinTop vs Peugeot 307 CC

Variants
L99 AT
LS3
1.6 105
1.6 115
1.6T
1.8 125
1.8 140
1.8 140 AT
1.9 CDTI
2.0T 170
2.0T 200
1.6i
2.0 HDi
2.0i 136
2.0i 136 AT
2.0i 177
2.0i 140
2.0i 140 AT
2.0i 177

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
205 L / 7.2 cu-ft ~ 440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
470 kg / 1036 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
122 mm / 4.8 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1378 mm / 54.3 in
1411 mm / 55.6 in
Size | Length
4837 mm / 190.4 in
4476 mm / 176.2 in
Size | Width
1917 mm / 75.5 in
1759 mm / 69.3 in | 2021 mm / 79.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1831 mm / 72.1 in (mirror folded)
1759 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
1497.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1481.0 mm / 58.3 in
Wheelbase
2852 mm / 112.3 in
2614 mm / 102.9 in
2608 mm / 102.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
0.31
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
76%
29%
20%
Pros
  • Athletic design
  • Wide range of powerful yet efficient engine choices
  • Improved drivetrain reliability
  • Cheap hardtop convertible
  • True top-down driving experience
  • Decent styling
  • Hardtop convertible
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Low side and rear visibility
  • Slow and sluggish
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Not very comfortable
  • Slow and sluggish
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Awkard profile

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.