Compare Toyota MR2 W30 vs Alfa Romeo Spider 916 vs Toyota Camry Solara 2 Convertible
Variants
1.8 T. Spark
2.0 JTS
2.0 T. Spark 150 Euro3
2.0 T. Spark 150
2.0 T. Spark 155
2.0 V6 TB
3.0 V6 192
3.0 V6 218
3.2 V6 240
2.4
3.3 5AT
3.3 4AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
90 L / 3.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Payload
175 kg / 386 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
185/55 R15, 205/50 R15
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1240 mm / 48.8 in
1425 mm / 56.1 in
Size | Length
3885 mm / 153.0 in
4890 mm / 192.5 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1816 mm / 71.5 in
Track Width | Front
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
Weight
1050.0 kg / 2314.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2450 mm / 96.5 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.5 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
0.29
Fuel Economy
10.5 L/100km / 22.4 MPG (urban) | 6.9 L/100km / 34.1 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Towing Capacity
1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
79.0 mm / 3.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.5 cu-in / 1794.0 cc
Engine | Power
140.0 hp / 104.4 kW @ 6400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
78.0 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
91.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
172 Nm / 126.9 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Manual
Production
Availability
1999 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
36%
23%
58%
Pros
- Cheap mid-engine roadster
- Small turning circle
- Decent engine offerings
- Decent driving dynamics
- Great reliability
- Good interior and exterior finish
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
- Miserably low engine output
- MacPherson front suspension
- Very little cargo space
- Quite ugly
- No powerful engine options
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very little cargo space
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.