Compare Ford Focus CC vs Ford Mustang 6 Convertible vs Ford Mustang 6 S550 Convertible facelift

Variants
1.6 Duratec
2.0 Duratec AT
2.0 TDCi
2.3 EcoBoost 309
2.3 EcoBoost 309 AT
2.3 EcoBoost 317
2.3 EcoBoost 317 AT
3.7 304
3.7 304 AT
GT 421
GT 421 AT
GT 426
GT 426 AT
2.3 EcoBoost
2.3 EcoBoost AT
5.0 GT
5.0 GT AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
238 L / 8.4 cu-ft ~ 534 L / 18.9 cu-ft
332 L / 11.7 cu-ft
323 L / 11.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
4
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55R16

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1456 mm / 57.3 in
1394 mm / 54.9 in
1394 mm / 54.9 in
Size | Length
4509 mm / 177.5 in
4788 mm / 188.5 in
Size | Width
1834 mm / 72.2 in
1915 mm / 75.4 in | 2080 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1933 mm / 76.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1654.0 mm / 65.1 in
Wheel Size
8J x 18
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
11.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
11.3 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Fuel Economy
8.3 L/100km / 28.3 MPG (combined) | 11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (urban) | 6.3 L/100km / 37.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
198.0 km/h / 123.0 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 122.0 cu-in / 1999.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
72.5 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
190 Nm / 140.1 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2010
2015 ~ 2017
2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
25%
78%
85%
Pros
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Hardtop convertible
  • Improved styling
  • Better build quality
  • Fully independent suspensions
  • Available with V8 and manual transmission
  • Handsome styling
  • Good pricing
  • RWD
Cons
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Awkward styling
  • Tiny inline-4 engine
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.