Compare Chrysler Sebring 3 Convertible vs Chrysler 200 Convertible
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.7
2.7 AT
3.5
3.5 AT
Hard Top 2.0 CRD
Soft Top 2.0 CRD
2.4
3.6
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
4
4
Payload
325 kg / 717 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R17, 215/55 R18
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4947 mm / 194.8 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in
1843 mm / 72.6 in
Track Width | Front
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1594.0 mm / 62.8 in
Weight
1775.0 kg / 3913.2 lbs
Wheel Size
6, 5J x 17, 7, 0J x 18
Wheelbase
2765 mm / 108.9 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2010
2011 ~ 2014
Reviews
Neofiliac score
43%
45%
Pros
- Available as both hard- and soft-top
- Decent petrol engines
- Better styled than the Sebring
- Decent drivetrain
- Good comfort
Cons
- Quite slow
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Somewhat awkward styling
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad handling
- Quite front-heavy
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.