Compare Chrysler Sebring 3 Convertible vs Chrysler Prowler vs Mazda MX-5 NC1
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.7
2.7 AT
3.5
3.5 AT
Hard Top 2.0 CRD
Soft Top 2.0 CRD
1.8
2.0 AT
2.0 6MT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
50 L / 1.8 cu-ft
150 L / 5.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
4
2
2
Payload
325 kg / 717 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
215/60 R17, 215/55 R18
225/45 R17, 295/40 R20
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1295 mm / 51.0 in
1245 mm / 49.0 in
Size | Length
4200 mm / 165.4 in
3995 mm / 157.3 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in
1945 mm / 76.6 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Weight
1775.0 kg / 3913.2 lbs
1290.0 kg / 2844.0 lbs
Wheel Size
6, 5J x 17, 7, 0J x 18
Wheelbase
2765 mm / 108.9 in
2880 mm / 113.4 in
2330 mm / 91.7 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
6.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.5 sec
Fuel Economy
13.8 L/100km / 17.0 MPG (urban) | 10.2 L/100km / 23.1 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.9:1
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 214.7 cu-in / 3518.0 cc
Engine | Power
257.0 hp / 191.6 kW @ 6400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
73.1 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
346 Nm / 255.2 lb-ft @ 3950 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2010
1997 ~ 2002
2005 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
43%
80%
86%
Pros
- Available as both hard- and soft-top
- Decent petrol engines
- Unique retro styling
- Well balanced
- Good handling
- Superb handling characteristics
- High reliability
- New hard top
- Sweet manual transmissions
- Improved performance
Cons
- Quite slow
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Somewhat awkward styling
- Very little cargo space
- Not a real performance machine
- Only available with small engines
- Very little cargo space
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.