Compare Jaguar F-Type Convertible vs Mercedes-AMG SL R232 vs Jaguar XK X150 Convertible facelift
Variants
2.0 AT
3.0 340
3.0 340 AT
3.0 380
3.0 380 AT
3.0 380 AWD AT
3.0 400 AWD AT
3.0 V6 (400 Hp) Automatic
5.0 AT
P300 AT
P340
P340 AT
P380
P380 AT
P380 AWD AT
R AT
R AWD AT
R Euro6d AWD AT
S
S AT
S AWD AT
SVR AWD AT
SVR Euro6d AWD AT
SL 55 4MATIC+
SL 63 4MATIC+
XK
XKR
XKR-S
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
213 L / 7.5 cu-ft ~ 240 L / 8.5 cu-ft
200 L / 7.1 cu-ft ~ 313 L / 11.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.3 L / 13.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.2 L / 7.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
70.6 L / 18.7 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 390 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 360 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
12.8 m / 42.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
100 mm / 3.9 in
Size | Length
4705 mm / 185.2 in
Size | Width
1915 mm / 75.4 in
2028 mm / 79.8 in (mirror unfolded) | 1892 mm / 74.5 in (mirror folded)
Wheelbase
2622 mm / 103.2 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2752 mm / 108.3 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
268 ~ 288 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Fuel Economy
11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (combined)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
M 177
AJ133
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.6:1
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 243.0 cu-in / 3982.0 cc
5.0 L / 305.1 cu-in / 5000.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic AMG SPEEDSHIFT MCT
Automatic
Production
Availability
2021
2011 ~ 2014
Reviews
Neofiliac score
89%
88%
93%
Pros
- Good performance
- Great styling
- Great handling
- Rather good performance
- Decent styling
- Good handling
- Good build quality
- Superb supercharged engines
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Comfortable yet sporty
- Better-looking than the coupe
Cons
- Loss of elegance compared to the XK
- Obsession with AWD
- I4 engine in an SL
- Larger than before
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.