Compare Opel Tigra TwinTop vs Peugeot 207 CC vs Citroen DS3 Cabrio

Variants
1.3 CDTI
1.4
1.4 AT
1.8
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi
1.6 VTi Euro5
1.6 VTi Euro5 AT
1.6 VTi AT
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 82
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 e-HDi 90
1.6 e-HDi 90 ETG
1.6 THP 155
1.6 THP 165
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft ~ 440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
245 L / 8.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.1 L / 7.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
3.8 L / 4.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
2
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Tire Size
185/60 R15
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
3-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1364 mm / 53.7 in
1458 mm / 57.4 in
Size | Length
3921 mm / 154.4 in
3948 mm / 155.4 in
Size | Width
1685 mm / 66.3 in
1748 mm / 68.8 in | 1972 mm / 77.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1818 mm / 71.6 in (mirror folded)
1715 mm / 67.5 in
Track Width | Front
1429.0 mm / 56.3 in
1469.0 mm / 57.8 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1467.0 mm / 57.8 in
Wheelbase
2491 mm / 98.1 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
122 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
16%
12%
Pros
  • Cheap hardtop convertible
  • Hardtop convertible
  • Improved exterior styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Reasonable reliability
Cons
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Diesel nonsense
  • Horrible suspension setup
  • Unreliable
  • Rough-running
  • Slow and sluggish
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Rough engines for a convertible
  • Hatchback-based
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.