Compare Opel Speedster vs Chevrolet Corvette C7 Convertible vs Opel Astra H TwinTop
Variants
2.0T
2.2
Grand Sport
Grand Sport AT
Stingray
Stingray AT
Z06
Z06 AT
ZR1
ZR1 AT
1.6 105
1.6 115
1.6T
1.8 125
1.8 140
1.8 140 AT
1.9 CDTI
2.0T 170
2.0T 200
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
206 L / 7.3 cu-ft
205 L / 7.2 cu-ft ~ 440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
36.0 L / 9.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Payload
470 kg / 1036 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent
Tire Size
175/55 R17, 225/45 R17
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
122 mm / 4.8 in
Size | Height
1117 mm / 44.0 in
1411 mm / 55.6 in
Size | Length
3786 mm / 149.1 in
4476 mm / 176.2 in
Size | Width
1710 mm / 67.3 in | 1884 mm / 74.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1759 mm / 69.3 in | 2021 mm / 79.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1831 mm / 72.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1468.0 mm / 57.8 in
1481.0 mm / 58.3 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2330 mm / 91.7 in
2614 mm / 102.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4
Engine
Z22SE (L61)
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
80%
96%
29%
Pros
- Superb handling
- Exceptionally light
- Decent speed
- Superb performance
- Much improved handling
- Great chassis and suspension
- High drivetrain reliability
- Unique 7-speed manual transmission
- Cheap hardtop convertible
- True top-down driving experience
- Decent styling
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Low cargo capacity
- The Targa may be more interesting
- Slow and sluggish
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Not very comfortable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.