Compare Pagani Zonda Roadster vs Mercedes SLS AMG Roadster vs Mercedes SL R231
Variants
Zonda Roadster
Zonda Cinque Roadster
Zonda Roadster F
Roadster
Final Edition GT Roadster
GT Roadster
SL 63 AMG 537
SL 63 AMG 585
SL 65 AMG
SL 350
SL 400
SL 500
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
173 L / 6.1 cu-ft
241 L / 8.5 cu-ft ~ 381 L / 13.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
14.0 L / 14.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
9.5 L / 10.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
Passengers
2
2
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.1 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
96 mm / 3.8 in
Size | Height
1261 mm / 49.6 in
1315 mm / 51.8 in
Size | Length
4638 mm / 182.6 in
4617 mm / 181.8 in
Size | Width
2055 mm / 80.9 in
1877 mm / 73.9 in
Track Width | Front
1682.0 mm / 66.2 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1604.0 mm / 63.1 in
Wheel Size
19 in, 20 in
19 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2730 mm / 107.5 in
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2585 mm / 101.8 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
308 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.36
Fuel Economy
13.2 L/100km / 17.8 MPG (combined) | 19.9 L/100km / 11.8 MPG (urban) | 9.3 L/100km / 25.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
M 159.980
Engine | Bore
102.2 mm / 4.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.3:1
Engine | Displacement
7.3 L / 444.9 cu-in / 7291.0 cc
6.2 L / 378.8 cu-in / 6208.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
94.6 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
650 Nm / 479.4 lb-ft @ 4750 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Reviews
Neofiliac score
98%
92%
97%
Pros
- Exceptionally sensuous styling
- Jewel-like instrument and controls
- Superb V12 engine
- Exceptional chassis and suspension
- Very light
- Superb performance
- Gorgeous styling
- Great drivetrain reliability
- Good build quality
- New, more reliable engine lineup
- New, better electronics
- Good, athletic styling
Cons
- Too exclusive
- No gull wing doors
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Very little cargo space
- Uglier than R230
- No more SL600
- ABC is better but still unreliable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.