Compare Citroen DS3 Cabrio vs Volkswagen New Beetle Cabriolet vs Citroen DS3 Cabrio
Variants
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 82
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 e-HDi 90
1.6 e-HDi 90 ETG
1.6 THP 155
1.6 THP 165
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
1.4
1.6 102
1.8 Turbo
1.9 TDI 101
1.9 TDI 105
2.0 AT
2.0
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 82
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 e-HDi 90
1.6 e-HDi 90 ETG
1.6 THP 155
1.6 THP 165
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
245 L / 8.7 cu-ft
245 L / 8.7 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
3.8 L / 4.0 qt
3.8 L / 4.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
3-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
3-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1458 mm / 57.4 in
1502 mm / 59.1 in
1458 mm / 57.4 in
Size | Length
3948 mm / 155.4 in
3948 mm / 155.4 in
Size | Width
1715 mm / 67.5 in
1715 mm / 67.5 in
Track Width | Front
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1467.0 mm / 57.8 in
1487.0 mm / 58.5 in
1467.0 mm / 57.8 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
600 kg / 1323 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Reviews
Neofiliac score
12%
21%
12%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Reasonable reliability
- So ugly it can be unforgettable
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Reasonable reliability
Cons
- Rough engines for a convertible
- Hatchback-based
- No independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Low cargo capacity
- Slow and sluggish
- No powerful engine options
- High 0.37 drag coefficient
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- Rough engines for a convertible
- Hatchback-based
- No independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.