Compare Mercedes CLC CL203 vs Mercedes A-Class W176 vs Mercedes C-Class SportCoupe
Variants
CLC 160
CLC 160 AT
CLC 180 Kompressor
CLC 180 Kompressor AT
CLC 200 CDI
CLC 200 CDI AT
CLC 200 Kompressor
CLC 200 Kompressor AT
CLC 220 CDI
CLC 220 CDI AT
CLC 230
CLC 230 AT
CLC 250
CLC 250 AT
CLC 350
CLC 350 AT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI DCT
A 180
A 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
A 180 DCT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI DCT
A 200
A 200 DCT
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI DCT
A 220 CDI DCT
A 250 4MATIC
A 250 DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 45 AMG
C 30 CDI AMG AT
C 32 AMG AT
C 160
C 160 AT
C 180
C 180 AT
C 180 Kompressor
C 180 Kompressor AT
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI AT
C 200 CGI
C 200 Kompressor Euro4
C 200 Kompressor
C 200 Kompressor Euro4 AT
C 200 Kompressor AT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI AT
C 220 CDI Euro4
C 220 CDI Euro4 AT
C 230
C 230 AT
C 230 Kompressor Euro4
C 230 Kompressor Euro4 AT
C 230 Kompressor
C 230 Kompressor AT
C 320
C 320 AT
C 350
C 350 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
310 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
341 L / 12.0 cu-ft ~ 1157 L / 40.9 cu-ft
310 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
4
5
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Trailing arm
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
Construction
Body Style
3-door Coupe
5-door Hatchback
3-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1405 mm / 55.3 in
1433 mm / 56.4 in
Size | Length
4292 mm / 169.0 in
4343 mm / 171.0 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in
Track Width | Front
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1553.0 mm / 61.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1476.0 mm / 58.1 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
31%
42%
34%
Pros
- RWD remained
- Slight interior improvements
- Low official fuel consumption
- Much improved styling
- Much improved fit and finish
- RWD-based
- Fully independent suspensions
Cons
- Arguably less appealing than its predecessor
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Cheaply put together
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- 4-cylinder AMG
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible AMGs
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.