Compare Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203 vs Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169 vs Toyota Aygo 2 (AB40)

Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169

Toyota Aygo 2 (AB40)

Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169Toyota Aygo 2 (AB40)
Variants
CLC 160
CLC 160 AT
CLC 180 Kompressor
CLC 180 Kompressor AT
CLC 200 CDI
CLC 200 CDI AT
CLC 200 Kompressor
CLC 200 Kompressor AT
CLC 220 CDI
CLC 220 CDI AT
CLC 230
CLC 230 AT
CLC 250
CLC 250 AT
CLC 350
CLC 350 AT
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
Pre-facelift Automatic
Pre-facelift Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score31%1%18%
Pros
  • RWD remained
  • Slight interior improvements
  • Three-pointed star
  • Cute exterior design
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Arguably less appealing than its predecessor
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Cheaply put together
  • Poor engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Great insult to the Mercedes name
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very little cargo space

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.