Compare Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203 vs Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169 vs Subaru Impreza 5 (GT)

Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169

Subaru Impreza 5 (GT)

Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169Subaru Impreza 5 (GT)
Variants
CLC 160
CLC 160 AT
CLC 180 Kompressor
CLC 180 Kompressor AT
CLC 200 CDI
CLC 200 CDI AT
CLC 200 Kompressor
CLC 200 Kompressor AT
CLC 220 CDI
CLC 220 CDI AT
CLC 230
CLC 230 AT
CLC 250
CLC 250 AT
CLC 350
CLC 350 AT
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
1.6i CVT
2.0i CVT

Reviews

Neofiliac score31%1%32%
Pros
  • RWD remained
  • Slight interior improvements
  • Three-pointed star
  • Good front-end styling
Cons
  • Arguably less appealing than its predecessor
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Cheaply put together
  • Poor engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Great insult to the Mercedes name
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Bad CVT
  • Hybrid nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.