Compare Mercedes C-Class SportCoupe vs SEAT Ibiza 5 vs SETA Ibiza 4 SportsCoupe

Variants
C 30 CDI AMG AT
C 32 AMG AT
C 160
C 160 AT
C 180
C 180 AT
C 180 Kompressor
C 180 Kompressor AT
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI AT
C 200 CGI
C 200 Kompressor Euro4
C 200 Kompressor
C 200 Kompressor Euro4 AT
C 200 Kompressor AT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI AT
C 220 CDI Euro4
C 220 CDI Euro4 AT
C 230
C 230 AT
C 230 Kompressor Euro4
C 230 Kompressor Euro4 AT
C 230 Kompressor
C 230 Kompressor AT
C 320
C 320 AT
C 350
C 350 AT
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 65
1.0 75
1.0 80
1.0 80 Euro6d
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 90
1.6 TDI 80
1.6 TDI 95
1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d
1.6 TDI 95 DSG
1.0 75
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 85
1.4 85 Euro5
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
1.4 TDI 80
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TFSI 180 Cupra
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG FR
1.4 TSI 180 DSG Cupra
1.6 105
1.6 105 DSG
1.6 81
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.8 TSI 192 Cupra
1.9 TDI 105
1.9 TDI 90
2.0 TDI 143
2.0 TDI 143 FR

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
310 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Coupe
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4343 mm / 171.0 in
4059 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1693 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2564 mm / 100.9 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
34%
17%
17%
Pros
  • RWD-based
  • Fully independent suspensions
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • More coherent design than Mk4
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible AMGs
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Somewhat ugly
  • Only available with small engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.