Compare Mercedes-Benz C-Class SportCoupe CL203 vs Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169 vs Toyota Aygo 2 (AB40)

Mercedes-Benz C-Class SportCoupe CL203

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169

Toyota Aygo 2 (AB40)

Mercedes-Benz C-Class SportCoupe CL203Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169Toyota Aygo 2 (AB40)
Variants
C 30 CDI AMG AT
C 32 AMG AT
C 160
C 160 AT
C 180
C 180 AT
C 180 Kompressor
C 180 Kompressor AT
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI AT
C 200 CGI
C 200 Kompressor Euro4
C 200 Kompressor
C 200 Kompressor Euro4 AT
C 200 Kompressor AT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI AT
C 220 CDI Euro4
C 220 CDI Euro4 AT
C 230
C 230 AT
C 230 Kompressor Euro4
C 230 Kompressor Euro4 AT
C 230 Kompressor
C 230 Kompressor AT
C 320
C 320 AT
C 350
C 350 AT
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
Pre-facelift Automatic
Pre-facelift Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score34%1%18%
Pros
  • RWD-based
  • Fully independent suspensions
  • Three-pointed star
  • Cute exterior design
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible AMGs
  • Poor engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Great insult to the Mercedes name
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very little cargo space

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.