Compare Mercedes-Benz CL-Class C216 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift Coupe vs Audi A5 B9 (F5) facelift

Mercedes-Benz CL-Class C216 facelift

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift Coupe

Audi A5 B9 (F5) facelift

Mercedes-Benz CL-Class C216 faceliftMercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift CoupeAudi A5 B9 (F5) facelift
Variants
CL 63 AMG Performance
CL 63 AMG
CL 65 AMG
CL 500 4MATIC
CL 500
CL 600
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180 MT
C 180
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300e 4MATIC
C 300e
C 300d 4MATIC
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
35 TDI
35 TFSI
35 TFSI MT
40 TDI 190
40 TDI 204
40 TDI 204 quattro
40 TDI quattro
40 TFSI 190
40 TFSI 204
40 TFSI 204 quattro
45 TDI quattro AT
45 TFSI 245 quattro
45 TFSI 265 quattro
50 TDI quattro AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score94%70%57%
Pros
  • Superb M275-powered V12s
  • Imposing, unmistakable styling
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • Interesting AMG V8 lived on for the last generation
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Decent performance
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • ABC problems
  • AWD nonsense
  • Mild-hybrid voodoo nonsense
  • Less durable engines
  • Rather ugly as a coupe (hunchback styling of fake coupe?)
  • Questionable reliability
  • Bland styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.