Compare Mercedes-Benz CL-Class C216 vs Mercedes-Benz S-Class C217 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift Coupe

Mercedes-Benz CL-Class C216

Mercedes-Benz S-Class C217 facelift

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift Coupe

Mercedes-Benz CL-Class C216Mercedes-Benz S-Class C217 faceliftMercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift Coupe
Variants
CL 63 AMG
CL 65 AMG
CL 500 4MATIC
CL 500
CL 600
S 63 AMG 4MATIC+
S 65 AMG
S 450 4MATIC
S 560 4MATIC
S 560
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180 MT
C 180
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300e 4MATIC
C 300e
C 300d 4MATIC
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC

Reviews

Neofiliac score97%89%70%
Pros
  • Awe-inspiring M275 V12 engine
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • More imposing styling
  • Characterful M156 engine in the CL63 AMG
  • Last chance to get the AMG V12
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • New 9G-Tronic automatic transmission
  • Interesting AMG V8 lived on for the last generation
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Cons
  • Some V8 reliability concerns
  • ABC problems
  • S63 AMG in AWD only
  • Uglier than before
  • AWD nonsense
  • Mild-hybrid voodoo nonsense
  • Less durable engines
  • Rather ugly as a coupe (hunchback styling of fake coupe?)

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.