Compare Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift Coupe vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class C204 Coupe vs Audi TT RS (8S)

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift Coupe

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C204 Coupe

Audi TT RS (8S)

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift CoupeMercedes-Benz C-Class C204 CoupeAudi TT RS (8S)
Variants
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180 MT
C 180
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300e 4MATIC
C 300e
C 300d 4MATIC
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
C 180
C 180 AT
C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY AT
C 200
C 200 AT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI AT
C 250 AT
C 250 CDI
C 250 CDI AT
C 350 AT
C 63 AMG
C 63 AMG Black Series
C 63 AMG Edition 507
C 63 AMG Performance

Reviews

Neofiliac score70%75%69%
Pros
  • Interesting AMG V8 lived on for the last generation
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Several versions of the NA C63 AMG
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Rather robust drivetrain
  • Quick and fast
  • Less ugly rear wing
Cons
  • AWD nonsense
  • Mild-hybrid voodoo nonsense
  • Less durable engines
  • Rather ugly as a coupe (hunchback styling of fake coupe?)
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Lower grade of build than the CLK
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No more manual transmission
  • Complicated emission control reduces reliability

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.