Compare Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 Coupe vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class C204 Coupe vs Audi TT RS (8S)

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 Coupe

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C204 Coupe

Audi TT RS (8S)

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 CoupeMercedes-Benz C-Class C204 CoupeAudi TT RS (8S)
Variants
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180
C 180 7AT
C 180 9AT
C 200
C 200 4MATIC AT
C 200 7AT
C 200 9AT
C 220d
C 220d 4MATIC AT
C 220d AT
C 250 7AT
C 250 9AT
C 250d 4MATIC AT
C 250d AT
C 300 7AT
C 300 9AT
C 400 4MATIC AT
C 180
C 180 AT
C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY AT
C 200
C 200 AT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI AT
C 250 AT
C 250 CDI
C 250 CDI AT
C 350 AT
C 63 AMG
C 63 AMG Black Series
C 63 AMG Edition 507
C 63 AMG Performance

Reviews

Neofiliac score68%75%69%
Pros
  • Still available with AMG V8
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Several versions of the NA C63 AMG
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Rather robust drivetrain
  • Quick and fast
  • Less ugly rear wing
Cons
  • Much uglier than the C204 C-Class Coupe and C208/C209 CLK
  • AWD nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Lower grade of build than the CLK
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No more manual transmission
  • Complicated emission control reduces reliability

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.