HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mercedes C-Class Coupe C204 vs Mercedes C-Class Coupe C205 facelift vs Audi A5 B9 facelift

Variants
C 180
C 180 AT
C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY AT
C 200
C 200 AT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI AT
C 250 AT
C 250 CDI
C 250 CDI AT
C 350 AT
C 63 AMG
C 63 AMG Black Series
C 63 AMG Edition 507
C 63 AMG Performance
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180 MT
C 180
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300e 4MATIC
C 300e
C 300d 4MATIC
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
35 TDI
35 TFSI
35 TFSI MT
40 TDI 190
40 TDI 204
40 TDI 204 quattro
40 TDI quattro
40 TFSI 190
40 TFSI 204
40 TFSI 204 quattro
45 TDI quattro AT
45 TFSI 245 quattro
45 TFSI 265 quattro
50 TDI quattro AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Passengers
4
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.6 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1406 mm / 55.4 in
1371 mm / 54.0 in
Size | Length
4697 mm / 184.9 in
Size | Width
1846 mm / 72.7 in | 2029 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Wheelbase
2760 mm / 108.7 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2764 mm / 108.8 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
75%
70%
57%
Pros
  • Several versions of the NA C63 AMG
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Rather robust drivetrain
  • Interesting AMG V8 lived on for the last generation
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Decent performance
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Lower grade of build than the CLK
  • AWD nonsense
  • Mild-hybrid voodoo nonsense
  • Less durable engines
  • Rather ugly as a coupe (hunchback styling of fake coupe?)
  • Questionable reliability
  • Bland styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.