Compare Mercedes C-Class Coupe C204 vs BMW M3 E92 Coupe vs BMW 4 Series F32 Coupe

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C204 Coupe (2011-2015)

Mercedes-Benz | Cars

BMW | Cars

Variants

C 180

C 180 AT

C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY

C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY AT

C 200

C 200 AT

C 220 CDI

C 220 CDI AT

C 250 AT

C 250 CDI

C 250 CDI AT

C 350 AT

C 63 AMG

C 63 AMG Black Series

C 63 AMG Edition 507

C 63 AMG Performance

M3 DCT

M3 GTS DCT

418d

418d AT

420d N47

420d N47 AT

420d N47 xDrive

420d N47 xDrive AT

420d B47

420d B47 AT

420d B47 xDrive

420d B47 xDrive AT

420i

420i AT

420i xDrive

420i xDrive AT

425d N47

425d N47 AT

425d B47

425d B47 AT

428i

428i AT

428i xDrive

428i xDrive AT

430d AT

430d xDrive AT

430i

430i AT

430i xDrive AT

435d xDrive AT

435I

435i AT

435i xDrive

435i xDrive AT

440i

440i AT

440i xDrive

440i xDrive AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

450 L / 15.9 cu-ft

445 L / 15.7 cu-ft

Engine Oil Capacity

8.8 L / 9.3 qt

Fuel Capacity

63.0 L / 16.6 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Ventilated discs

Power Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Construction

Body Style

2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height

1406 mm / 55.4 in

Size | Length

4638 mm / 182.6 in

Size | Width

1804 mm / 71.0 in

Track Width | Front

1549.0 mm / 61.0 in

Track Width | Rear

1552.0 mm / 61.1 in

1539.0 mm / 60.6 in

Wheelbase

2760 mm / 108.7 in

2810 mm / 110.6 in

Performance

Towing Capacity

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Euro 6

Engine | Bore

92.0 mm / 3.6 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

12.0:1

Engine | Type

Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 engine with 4 values per cylinder

Reviews

Neofiliac score

75%

78%

71%

Pros

Several versions of the NA C63 AMG
Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Rather robust drivetrain

Characterful, high-revving S65 V8
New DCT that replaced the SMG
Good styling

Modern, aggressive styling
Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Improved interior
Good ZF 8HP automatic transmission

Cons

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Lower grade of build than the CLK

Unreliable engine

Poor engine reliability
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Handling worse than its predecessors

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.